BondFoundry
Use case · Engineers & CTOs

Segregation of duties for AI agents

Enforce four-eyes and dual-approval controls on an autonomous agent at the API layer — not the UI — so the agent can never self-approve.

The problem

Guardrails enforced in the UI are trivially bypassed by an agent that calls the API directly. Split a large order into sub-materiality slices and a naive notional check waves it through.

The BondFoundry approach

Segregation of duties is checked server-side on every request: the approver identity must differ from the agent caller, and T3 irreversible actions require two distinct approvers with a manager role on at least one. A session-aggregate materiality ledger closes the split-trade bypass by tracking cumulative notional across the session.

How it flows

The governed lifecycle for this pattern.

  1. 01

    Agent requests approval

    The API — not the UI — is the enforcement point for every HITL request.

  2. 02

    Approver identity is verified

    A self-approval attempt returns 403 and writes an audit row counting toward AIR-OP-18.

  3. 03

    Aggregate materiality is tracked

    Cumulative notional within a session triggers HITL even when no single slice does.

  4. 04

    Dual-HITL for irreversible actions

    T3 needs two distinct approvers, both distinct from the caller.

Outcome

The agent is fast, but it can never approve its own irreversible actions or slice its way past a materiality threshold.

AIGF refs AIR-OP-18AIR-OP-4AIR-SEC-24
See it live

20 minutes on a real desk, end to end.